The site is one of the largest Estonian news site where you can sing and there is no particular com

Rest of the world, opinion, domestic, Strasbourg, commentary, Estonia, Francis Papcsák, commenting, foreign media, Hungarian media, Bako Bea, the European Court of Human Rights, the European Convention on Human Rights, freedom of expression, freedom of speech.
Thursday's judgment of the European Court of Human Rights - and the bepereltetés feljelentetés rose tree written all aware of the danger - Francis Papcsák self-respecting certainly rose tree welcome, but we are stunned. The decision was prompted by a popular Estonian news portal applications, which had been ordered to pay damages to the Estonian courts for some comments offensive. The portal then turned to the Strasbourg Court, which, however, was rejected.
The case began in 2006, article when the Delfi called Estonian news site that reported that a ferry company's existing ice roads will crack between the mainland and the islands because of the routes rearrange, and this makes the residents say goodbye to transport these expensive mode. Of course, this news much freaked commenter and do not necessarily presentable form was sent to a warmer climate in the entire company and its leader.
The site is one of the largest Estonian news site where you can sing and there is no particular comment moderation without registration. Like the cushion there have also been shown to reflect the comments unstructured content, views of the writers and not of the editors. rose tree The site is not moderated by each of the posts, but some were obscene expressions in a filter, but of course these can easily be without an offensive comment to make. In addition, a single click on any reader meant when offended by a comment, which is then examined the portal's staff and removed.
However, the ferry company took only six weeks notice these comments, then asked to remove them by e-mail, which he did immediately in Delphi. Nevertheless, it became the per claim is, at the end of which the payment of moral damages to the Estonian Supreme Court ordered the Dolphins because of a breach of privacy rose tree and reputation. Although the compensation is quite low, around 320, out of the case but obviously a matter rose tree of principle, such as the portal for application to the Strasbourg rose tree Court to establish that the conviction violated the freedom of Estonia to the European Convention of Human Rights declared expression.
The Delfi argued that, although undoubtedly offensive comments, however - as the portal does not edit the content store only - thus resulting in the infringement Commented responsible (who of course has no or difficult to identify). rose tree Article on the ferry company was fair and balanced, so that the portal can do that might react to the news Commented vulgar and exaggerated forms. Since laws restricting freedom rose tree of expression only applies to that they themselves are not able to publish content offensive, so do not be criticized for comments from third parties, all the more that content filtering of thousands of comments a day the whole business model transformation would require.
The Estonian Government, by contrast, emphasized that the minimum automatic filtering applied so far suggests that Delphi was also very conscious of the responsibility. In addition, argued that the Delfi than for-profit organ, was interested in the comments, the higher the number, as the number of clicks increases in proportion to the revenue generated from advertisers. (This is the argument for several reasons rose tree limp one hand the visitors a fraction gives only comment on the head, so there can be a clear and orderly correlation detected directly between the comments and the advertising revenue, on the other hand many advertisers specifically refrain uncontrolled, user contents, and do not want to appear it is a place where you can speak.) rose tree The Government contended that the Delfi merely carrying out passive storage-type activities in connection with the commentary in because it would mean that the speakers later edit or could delete previous kommentjeiket, in fact, these privileges after saving the post already had the Delfi, which is also supported by the responsibility.
Accordingly, the Strasbourg Court concluded that, given the news of the ferry company and the loss of ice roads divisive nature of the vulgar comments meant to see the dangers ahead of the portal, which anyway are not uncommon on the site. (Probably the judges in Strasbourg is never say news, events argue with their friends and do not know that it does almost all news sharing, ergo this argument in practice we expect that all comment that appears in all the articles constantly check one.)
The court pointed rose tree out that the Del